Mini-review on pineapple genetic transformation

*Article not assigned to an issue yet

, , , , , ,


Review Articles | Published:

E-ISSN: 2229-4473.
Website: www.vegetosindia.org
Pub Email: contact@vegetosindia.org
DOI: 10.1007/s42535-025-01160-x
First Page: 0
Last Page: 0
Views: 1434

Keywords: n Ananas comosus (L.) Merr., Genetically modified organisms, Phenotypic traits, Pineapple genetic improvement, Public perception on GMO


Abstract


Pineapple is a highly valuable tropical fruit crop with significant economic importance. In pineapple cultivation, several traits could benefit from genetic improvement, such as disease resistance, drought tolerance, fruit quality, shelf life, and yield. The methods used to genetically improve pineapple include traditional breeding, mutagenesis, biotechnology, genetic engineering, and in vitro culture. A few notable scientific groups worldwide performing pineapple genetic transformation include the South China Agricultural University, the Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, the University of Hawaii, and Del Monte. The main transgenes introduced into the pineapple genome are the antisense ACC oxidase gene, herbicide resistance genes, carotenoid biosynthesis genes, and disease resistance genes. Our group at the Bioplant Centre, University of Ciego de Ávila, Cuba, also transformed pineapple and evaluated the field performance over more than 8 years. We compared transgenic ¨Cayena Lisa Serrana¨ cultivar plants to macropropagated controls, evaluating physiological and biochemical indicators of the phenotype. Out of 160 characters evaluated, significant differences were observed in 88 characters between the transgenic plants and the conventionally vegetative propagated plants, and in 70 characters between the transgenic plants and the micropropagated plants. Overall, the phenotype of the transformed material conforms to the phenotype of the two controls. These consistent data reflect the usefulness of characterizing the modified plants.



References


Aidoo M (2021) Effects of Pineapple Cultivation on Rural Smallholder farmers in the Ekumfi District of Central Region. Ghana, University of Cape Coast, Ghana


Ali MM, Hashim N, Abd Aziz S, Lasekan O (2020) Pineapple (Ananas comosus): a comprehensive review of nutritional values, volatile compounds, health benefits, and potential food products. Food Res Int 137:1–13


Alvarez D, Cerda-Bennasser P, Stowe E, Ramirez-Torres F, Capell T, Dhingra A, Christou P (2021) Fruit crops in the era of genome editing: closing the regulatory gap. Plant Cell Rep 40:915–930


de Lira Júnior JS, Bezerra JEF, Canuto VTB, dos Santos DA (2021) Variation among pineapple half-sibs and selecting genitors based on potential genetic divergence. World J Adv Res Reviews 10:289–301


Dhurve L, Ajith Kumar K, Bhaskar J, Sobhana A, Francies RM, Mathew D (2021) Wide variability among the ‘Mauritius’ somaclones demonstrates somaclonal variation as a promising improvement strategy in pineapple (Ananas comosus L). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult (PCTOC) 145:701–705


Espinosa P, Lorenzo JC, Iglesias A, Yabor L, Menéndez E, Borroto J, Hernández L, Arencibia A (2002) Production of pineapple transgenic plants assisted by temporary immersion bioreactors. Plant Cell Rep 21:136–140


Fernando Y, Harahap F, Diningrat DS (2020) In Vitro Propagation of Pineapple (Ananas comosusL.) Shoots from Sipahutar North Sumatera Indonesia, pp. 1–9 Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 1485. IOP Publishing, Canadá


Firatoiu A-R, Chiurciu I-A, Marcuta L, Chereji A-I, Soare E, Voicu V, Marcuta A (2021) Study on the production and marketing of Pineapples Worldwide, pp. 4973–4985 37th International Business Information Management Association (IBIMA), Cordoba, Spain.


IOP Publishing, Ed. (2020). J Physics: Conference Series. IOP Publishing


He Y, Luan A, Wu J, Zhang W, Lin W (2023) Overcoming key technical challenges in the genetic transformation of pineapple. Trop Plant 2:1–7


Jia P, Liu S, Lin W, Yu H, Zhang X, Xiao X, Sun W, Lu X, Wu Q (2024) Authenticity identification of F 1 Hybrid Offspring and Analysis of Genetic Diversity in Pineapple. Agronomy 14:1490–1499


Kaur N, Awasthi P, Tiwari S (2020) Fruit crops improvement using CRISPR/Cas9 system. Genome engineering via CRISPR-Cas9 system. Elsevier, pp 131–145


Kim KB (2024) Use of CRISPR-Cas9 in agriculture. J High School Sci 8:212–228


Kumar K, Kaur R (2021) Genetic Engineering in Fruit crops. Winemaking. CRC, pp 191–223


Lakho MA, Jatoi MA, Solangi N, Abul-Soad AA, Qazi MA, Abdi G (2023) Optimizing in vitro nutrient and ex vitro soil mediums-driven responses for multiplication, rooting, and acclimatization of pineapple. Sci Rep 13:1–10


Li D, Jing M, Dai X, Chen Z, Ma C, Chen J (2022) Current status of pineapple breeding, industrial development, and genetics in China. Euphytica 218:1–17


Li Q, Wang G, Lai S, Zhu S (2023) ABA and GA3 differentially regulate pineapple internal browning through modulating spermidine metabolism. LWT 182:1–11


Lobato-Gómez M, Hewitt S, Capell T, Christou P, Dhingra A, Girón-Calva PS (2021) Transgenic and genome-edited fruits: background, constraints, benefits, and commercial opportunities. Hort Res 8:1–16


Lorenzo JC, Yabor L, Medina N, Quintana N, Wells V (2015) Coefficient of variation can identify the most important effects of experimental treatments. Not Bot Horti Agrobo Cluj-Nap 43:287–291


Maan S, Sharma V, Brar J (2023) Improvement of fruit crops through Radiation-Induced mutations facing Climate Change. Mutation breeding for sustainable Food Production and Climate Resilience. Springer, pp 693–718


Mehraj M, Das S, Feroz F, Waheed Wani A, Dar S, Kumar S, Wani AK, Farid A (2024) Nutritional composition and therapeutic potential of Pineapple Peel–A. Compr Rev Chem Bio 21:e202400315


Mohsin A, Jabeen A, Majid D, Allai FM, Dar A, Gulzar B, Makroo H (2020) Pineapple. In: Nayik GA, Gull A (eds) Antioxidants in fruits: Properties and Health benefits. Springer, Switzerland, pp 379–396


Olah OM, Okon ET (2022) Factors affecting Pineapple production in Central Agricultural Zone of Cross River State, Nigeria. Am J Environ Resource Econ 7:8–14


Paull RE, Ksouri N, Kantar M, Zerpa-Catanho D, Chen NJ, Uruu G, Yue J, Guo S, Zheng Y, Wai CMJ (2023) Differential gene expression during floral transition in pineapple. Plant Direct 7:1–29


Paz-Arteaga SL, Cadena-Chamorro E, Goméz-García R, Serna-Cock L, Aguilar CN, Torres-León C (2024) Unraveling the Valorization Potential of Pineapple Waste to obtain value-added products towards a sustainable circular bioeconomy. Sustainability 16:1–18


Pérez-Bonachea L, Luján-Hidalgo MC, Daquinta M, Guevara-Hernández F, Garro G, Hajari E, Ruíz-Valdiviezo VM, Lorenzo JC, Yabor L (2023) Chemical composition of roots of transgenic pineapple plants. Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant 59:839–843


Raffi ANM (2020) Genetic variation of Clonal Ananas Comosus Var. MD2 plants after mutagenic treatment at different Post-recovery Periods. University of Malaya (Malaysia), Kuala Lumpur


Silva DC, Krause W, Arantes DSO, Freitas AP, Santos EA, de Araújo DV, Silva CA (2024) Pineapple breeding: development of new pineapple cultivars without leaf spines and resistant to fusariosis. Euphytica 220:1–11


Yabor L, Arzola M, Aragón C, Hernández M, Arencibia A, Lorenzo JC (2006) Biochemical side effects of genetic transformation of pineapple. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 86:63–67


Yabor L, Aragón C, Hernández M, Arencibia A, Lorenzo JC (2008) Biochemical side effects of the herbicide FINALE on bar gene-containing transgenic pineapple plantlets. Euphytica 164:515–520


Yabor L, Valle B, Carvajal C, Aragón C, Hernández M, González J, Daquinta M, Arencibia A, Lorenzo JC (2010) Characterization of a field-grown transgenic pineapple clone containing the genes chitinase, AP24, and bar. Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 46:1–7


Yabor L, Valle B, Rodríguez RC, Aragón C, Papenbrock J, Tebbe CC, Lorenzo JC (2016) The third vegetative generation of a field-grown transgenic pineapple clone shows minor side effects of transformation on plant physiological parameters. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 125:303–308


Yabor L, Rumlow A, Gómez D, Tebbe CC, Papenbrock J, Lorenzo JC (2017) Mineral composition of a transgenic pineapple clone grown in the field for 8 year. Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant 53:489–493


Yabor L, Gómez D, Pérez L, Martínez J, Escalante D, Garro G, Hajari E, Sershen, Lorenzo JC (2020a) Pineapple fruits from transgenic plants have limited differences on mesocarp biochemical component contents. Acta Physiol Plant 43:1–9


Yabor L, Pérez L, Gómez D, Villalobos– Olivera A, Mendoza JR, Martínez J, Escalante D, Garro G, Hajari E, Lorenzo JC (2020b) Histological evaluation of pineapple transgenic plants following eight years of field growth. Euphytica; DOI: 101007/s10681-020-2555-6 216:1–8


Yamada M, Nashima K, Takeuchi M, Ohmine Y, Shoda M (2024) Phenotypic selection to avoid discarding Target genotypes for four Fruit traits based on environmental variances in a Pineapple Cross-seedling Population. HortScience 59:639–644


Zhang W, Wu J, He J, Liu C, Yi W, Xie J, Wu Y, Xie T, Ma J, Zhong Z (2024) AcMYB266, a key regulator of the red coloration in pineapple peel: a case of subfunctionalization in tandem duplicated genes. Hort Res 11:1–11


Zhang Y, Xu Z, Xie T, Zhang W, He Y, Liu C (2022) In vitro selection and identification of a cold-tolerant variant in pineapple (Ananas comosus). Hort Environ Biotechnol 63:275–286

 


Author Information


Bioplant Center, University of Ciego de Ávila Máximo, Gómez Báez, Cuba