Investigating the singular and synergistic impact of bio-stimulants on the physico-chemical properties of soil in the rhizosphere of guava (Psidium guajava L.) cv. Sardar

*Article not assigned to an issue yet

, , ,


Research Articles | Published:

E-ISSN: 2229-4473.
Website: www.vegetosindia.org
Pub Email: contact@vegetosindia.org
DOI: 10.1007/s42535-024-01157-y
First Page: 0
Last Page: 0
Views: 1699

Keywords: Bio-stimulants, Humic acid, Seaweed, Silicon, Soil fertility, Microbial activity, Rhizosphere and physico-chemical properties


Abstract


The goal of the field experiment, which took place in 2020–21 at the Instructional Farm, Department of Fruit Science, College of Horticulture and Forestry, Jhalawar (AU Kota), was to investigate the physical–chemical properties of soil in the rhizosphere of guava (Psidium guajava L.) cv. Sardar, as well as the singular and synergistic impact of bio-stimulants. Nineteen treatments were analysed in a randomised block design with three replications, including three bio-stimulants applied through soil drenching: silicon, seaweed and humic acid. The results of the study showed that the application of bio-stimulants, specifically T12 (humic acid 15 g + seaweed 60 g), greatly improved the pH, electrical conductivity, organic carbon content and nutrient availability of the soil. In addition, microbial populations within the rhizosphere demonstrated a significant increase, particularly in favourable weather circumstances. These results highlight the ability of bio-stimulants to improve plant development and soil health in guava plantations. Comprehending the complex interplay between soil parameters and bio-stimulants might provide valuable insights for sustainable farming methods that aim to optimize yield while reducing ecological footprint. To further understand the long-term impacts and underlying mechanisms of bio-stimulants mediated changes in soil fertility and microbial activity, more study in this field is necessary.

Bio-stimulants, Humic acid, Seaweed, Silicon, Soil fertility, Microbial activity, Rhizosphere and physico-chemical properties


References


Abreu JRD, Santos CDD, Abreu CMPD, Pinheiro ACM, Corrêa AD (2012) Ripening pattern of guava cv. Pedro Sato. Food Sci Technol 32:344–350


Al-Hadethi MEA (2015) Effect of different fertilization sources and the growth regulator (Brassinosteroids) on growth and yield of Apricot trees. Ph.D. Dissertation, College of Agric., Univ. of Baghdad, 153


Ali HA, Mohamed MAK (2016) Effect of fruiting spur length and spraying seaweed extract on yield and berries quality of early sweet grapevines. Assiut J Agric Sci 47:504–517 (6– 2)


Bose SK, Ahmed S, Howlader P, Ali M (2019) Flowering, fruiting behavior and nutritional quality of selected guava genotypes. Int J Hortic Sci Technol 6(1):11–25


Bulgari R, Cocetta G, Trivellini A, Vernieri PAOLO, Ferrante A (2015) Biostimulants and crop responses: a review. Biol Agric Hortic 31(1):1–17


Colla G, Nardi S, Cardarelli M, Ertani A, Lucini L, Canaguier R, Rouphael Y (2015) Protein hydrolysates as biostimulants in horticulture. Sci Hort 196:28–38


du Jardin P (2012) The Science of Plant Biostimulants–A bibliographic analysis. Ad hoc study report


El-Kareem MRG, Montaser MA (2013) Response of Ruby Seedless grapevines to foliar application of seaweed extract, salicylic acid and roselle extract. Hortsci J Suez Canal Univ 1:294–303


Gomaa AM, Ibrahim HF (2020) Williams Banana Growth, Nutritional Status, Yield and Fruit Quality as Influenced by spraying Humic Acid and Seaweed Extract. J Plant Prod 11(11):1121–1128


La Torre A, Battaglia V, Caradonia F (2016) An overview of the current plant biostimulant legislations in different European Member States. J Sci Food Agric 96(3):727–734


Liu C, Copper RJ, Bowman DC (1998) Humic acid application effects photosynthesis root development and nutrient content of creeping bent grass. Hort Sci 33:1023–1025


Muscolo A, Sidari M, Attina E (2007) Biological activity of humic substances is related to their chemical structure. Soil Sci Soc Amer J 71:75–85


Mustafa NS, El-Shazly SM (2013) Impact of some bio-stimulant substances on growth parameters of Washington Navel orange trees. Middle East J Appl Sci 34:156–160


Nardi S, Pizzeghello D, Muscolo A, Vianello A (2002) Physiological effects of humic substances on higher plants. Soil Biol Biochem 34:1527–1536


Ngullie CR, Tank RV, Bhanderi DR (2014) Effect of salicylic acid and humic acid on flowering, fruiting, yield and quality of mango (Mangifera indica L.) Cv. kesar


Panse VG, Sukhatme PV Statistical methods for agricultural workers, 4thedition. ICAR, New Delhi. 58–152., Parmar HN, Polara ND, Viradiya RR (1995) (2013).Effect of mulching material on growth, yield and quality of watermelon (Citrullus lanatus Thunb) cv. Kiran. Universal Journal of Agricultural Research, 1(2): 30–37


Pramer D, Schmidt EL (1964) Experimental soil microbiology. Soil Sci 98(3):211


Rouphael Y, Colla G (2020) Biostimulants in agriculture. Front Plant Sci 11:40


Sato R, Dang KM, McPherson BG, Brown AC (2010) Anticancer activity of guava (Psidium guajava) extracts. J Complement Integr Med, 7(1)


Sharma S, Rana VS, Prasad H, Lakra J, Sharma U (2021) Appraisal of carbon capture, storage and utilization through fruit crops. Front Environ Sci 9:700768


Wally OSD, Critchley AT, Hiltz D, Craigie JS, Han X, Zaharia LI, Abrams SR, Prithiviraj B (2013) Regulation of phytohormone biosynthesis and accumulation in Arabidopsis following treatment with commercial extract from the marine macroalga Ascophyllum nodosum. J Plant Growth Regulator 32:324–339


Zhang X, Ervin EH (2004) Cytokinin-containing seaweed and humic acid extracts associated with creeping bent grass leaf cytokining and drought resistance. Crop Sci 44:1737–1745

 


Author Information


Scholar Department of Horticulture, SKRAU, Bikaner, India