*Article not assigned to an issue yet
Gunugurthi Akhil, Sudharshanam Upendhar, Kalisetti Vani Sree, Satturu Vanisri
Keywords: FAW, Maize phenological stages, Neonates, Artificial infestation and yield loss
The fall armyworm (FAW) Spodoptera frugiperda is originally from the tropical and subtropical regions of America and has been present in the United States since 1797. However, FAW was first reported in India in May 2018 by the University of Agricultural and Horticultural Sciences, Shivamogga, Karnataka (Sharanabasappa et al., First report of fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), an alien invasive pest on maize in India). By the 2019 monsoon season, FAW had spread to the northwestern parts of India, and by 2019-20, it had affected a total of 214,339 hectares across the country (Suby et al. Invasion of fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) in India: nature, distribution, management and potential impact). Yield loss by the FAW had been attempted by artificial infestation in screen house since a systematic investigation of yield loss had not yet been reported. Artificial infestation was done at V2, V5, V8, and V12 phrenological stages of the maize crop using known numbers of S. frugiperda neonates applied near the leaf whorl with a camel brush during morning hours between 8.00 to 11.00AM. Observations on Leaf Injury Rating (LIR) were recorded 15 days after the artificial infestation, Observations on ear damage rating was recorded after harvesting on 20 plants in each replication. Percent yield loss was computed comparing with the yield obtained in control. A field experiment was conducted at Maize Research Centre in Rajendranagar, Hyderabad during rabi 2021-22 to evaluate the impact of fall armyworm (FAW) on maize yield. The experiment was designed as a Split Plot, with the main plots representing different phenological stages of the crop (V2, V5, V8, and V12), and the subplots representing the number of larvae released per plant (5, 10, 15, 20, and 0 larvae/plant). The study recorded data on leaf injury rating, ear damage rating, the quantity and percentage of cob and grain yield loss. The results showed that the highest leaf injury rating (8.80) and ear damage rating (8.77) were observed at the V2 stage with 20 larvae/plant. The lowest leaf injury rating (1.83) and ear damage rating (1.40) were observed at the V12 stage with 5 larvae/plant. Control 0 larvae/plant resulted in the lowest leaf injury rating (1.00) and ear damage rating (1.00) across all the stages. The highest cob yield (9799.07 kg ha-1) and grain yield (8769.14 kg ha-1) were recorded at the V12 stage with 0 larvae/plant, while the lowest cob yield (2012.58 kg ha-1) and grain yield (1620.31 kg ha-1) were recorded at the V2 stage with 20 larvae/plant. The highest cob yield loss (7520.79 kg ha-1) and grain yield loss (6926.70 kg ha-1) were recorded at the V2 stage with 20 larvae/plant, while the minimum cob yield loss (289.03 kg ha-1) and grain yield loss (543.96 kg ha-1) were observed at the V12 stage with 5 larvae/plant. The highest percentage of cob yield loss (78.88%) and grain yield loss (81.04%) were recorded at the V2 stage with 20 larvae/plant, while the lowest percentage of cob yield loss (2.94%) and grain yield loss (6.20%) were recorded at the V12 stage with 5 larvae/plant.
Agricultural MI, Cell PJTSAU (2021) Department of Economics. College of Agriculture, Rajendranagar
Chouraddi M, Mallapur CP (2017) Assessment of crop loss and economic injury level of maize stem borer, Chilo partellus (Swinhoe). J Entomol Zool Stud 5(4):1530–1535
Davis FM, Williams WP (1992) Visual rating scales for screening whorl-stage corn for resistance to fall armyworm technical bulletin (Mississippi agricultural and forestry experiment station. 186:1–9
Gomez KA, Gomez AA (1984) Statistical procedures for agricultural research, second edition. John willey and sons. New York
Kumar B, Chikkappa GK, Jat SL, Parihar CM, Yathish KR, Singh V, Hooda KS, Abhijit KD, Ganapati M, Sekhar JC, Kumar R, Kumar RS (2012) Maize biology: An Introduction, Directorate of Maize Research, Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR). Technical Bulletin. 1–25
Kumar P, Suby SB, Jaswinder K, Bajya DR, Sekhar JC, Lakshmi SP, Jawala J, Ranvir S, Bana JK, Reddy LM, Jha GK (2021) Assessment of crop loss caused by Chilo partellus in maize. Indian J Agricultural Sci 91(2):25–32
Lima MS, Oliveira OF, Silva PSL, Silva KMB (2009) Corn yield response to weed & fall armyworm controls. Planta Daninha 28(1):103–111
Murua G, Molina-Ochoa J, Coviella C (2006) Population dynamics of the fall armyworm, and its parasitoids in Northwestern Argentina. Fla Entomol 89(2):175–182
Prasanna B, Huesing J, Eddy R, Peschke V (2018) Fall Armyworm in Africa: A Guide for Integrated Pest Management CIMMYT; USAID, Mexico. Available online: https://repository.cimmyt.org/xmlui/handle/10883/19204 (accessed on 21 October 2018)
Sharanbasappa D, Kalleshwarasamy CM, Ashokan R, Maruthi MS, Pavithra HB, Kavita H, Shivaray N, Prabhu ST, Goergen G (2018) First report of fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda (J E Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), an alien invasive pest on maize in India. Pest Manage Hortic Ecosyst 24(1):23–29
Suby SB, Soujanya LP, Yadava P, Patil JK, Subaharan, Prasad GS, Babu KS, Jat SL, Yathish KR, Vadassery JL, Vinay K, Kalia N, Bakthavatsalam JC, Shekhar, Rakshit S (2020) Invasion of fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) in India: nature, distribution, management and potential impact. Curr Sci 119(1):44–51. www.indiastat.com/agriculture/2/stats.aspx
Professor Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University (PJTSAU), Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, India