*Article not assigned to an issue yet
Kumar Mithlesh, Patel Manubhai, Solanki Satyanarayan, Gami Raman
Keywords:
Stability, Mega-environments, Winning genotype, Which-won-where, GGE biplot
A biplot analysis used in the present study, which delineated total variation into the three principal components (PCs), accounted for 96.69, 66.71, and 71.20% of the total GEI for root branches, diameter, and length, respectively. SKA-11 for root branching, SKA-17 and SKA-23 for root diameter, and SKA-23 and SKA-25 for root length were determined to be the most productive genotypes. Two mega-environments for root branches, diameter, and length have been identified using a GGE biplot. In the first mega-environment, the winning genotypes for root branches were SKA-29 and SKA-24, while in the second mega-environment, the winning genotype was SKA-11. SKA-19 and SKA-12 were the winning genotypes in the first and second mega-environments, respectively, based on root diameter. In terms of root length, the genotypes that were victorious in the first, second, third, and fourth mega-environments were SKA-26, AWS-1, SKA-3, and SKA-11. For root branches, Bhi16 was the most discriminating and representative environment; for root diameter, it was Bhi16; and for root length, it was Skn17, Jag17, Bhi17, Skn18, Jag18, and Bhi18. In order to enhance the morphology of Indian ginseng roots, it would be advised to breed for genotypes that are both widely adaptable and location-specific.
(*Only SPR Life Members can get full access.)
Arya RK, Koli GK, Kumar R (2022) Studies on ashwagandha [Withania somnifera] elite genotypes for root yield and attributes under heat stress condition. Indian J Ecol 49(3):1214–1219
Biru A, Kassahun T, Teklehaimanot H, Dagnachew L (2017) Genotype by environment interactions and grain yield stability of released and advanced desi type chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes in western Ethiopia. Int J Biotechnol Mol Biol Res 8(3):30–37
Kendal E, Tekdal S, Karaman M (2019) Proficiency of biplot methods (AMMI and GGE) in the appraisal of triticale genotypes in multiple environments. Appl Ecol Environ Res 17(3):5995–6007
Kumar RR, Reddy LP, Kumar JV, Komaraiah K, Purnanand S, Sastry KP (2012) Multivariate analysis and genetic diversity for morphometric and root textural quality traits in ashwagandha (Withania somnifera Dunal). Ind Crop Prod 35:199–202
Kumar M, Patel MP, Chauhan RM, Tank CJ, Solanki SD, Gami RA, Soni NV, Patel PC, Patel PT, Bhadauria HS, Patel NB (2020a) Delineating G × E interactions by AMMI method for root attributes in ashwagandha [Withania somnifera (L.) Dunal]. Indian J Genet Plant Breed 80(4):441–449
Kumar M, Patel M, Chauhan R, Tank C, Solanki S, Gami R (2021) Genetic analysis in Indian ginseng [Withania somnifera (L) Dunal]. Electron J Plant Breed 12(3):804–811
Kumar M, Patel M, Chauhan R, Tank C, Solanki S (2022a) Unravelling the G × E interactions using AMMI biplot for phenology and agro-morphological traits in linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.). J Oilseeds Res 39(2):86–97
Kumar M, Patel M, Solanki S, Gami R (2022b) Evaluation of Indian ginseng [Withania somnifera (L.) Dunal] breeding lines and genotype-by-environment interaction across production environments in western India. Vegetos. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42535-023-00626-0
Kumar M, Patel M, Chauhan R, Tank C, Solanki S, Patel P, Bhadauria H, Gami R, Pachchigar K, Soni N, Patel P (2020b) Elucidation of genotype-environment interactions and genetic stability parameters for yield, quality and agromorphological traits in ashwagandha [Withania somnifera (L.) Dunal]. J Genet 99, 59: 1–16.
Kumar M, Patel M, Chauhan R, Tank C, Solanki S (2020c) Deciphering genotype × environment interactions by AMMI method for yield and component traits in linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.). J Oilseeds Res 37(2): 120–133.
Mir BA, Khazir J, Mir NA, Hasan TU, Koul S (2012) Botanical, chemical and pharmacological review of Withania somnifera (Indian ginseng): an ayurvedic medicinal plant. Indian J Drugs Dis 1(6):147–160
Neisse AC, Kirch JL, Hongyu K (2018) AMMI and GGE Biplot for genotype × environment interaction: a medoid-based hierarchical cluster analysis approach for high-dimensional data. Biom Lett 55(2):97–121
R Development Core Team (2021) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org.
Rakshit S, Ganapathy KN, Gomashe SS, Rathore A, Ghorade RB, Kumar MN, Ganesmurthy K, Jain SK, Kamtar MY, Sachan JS, Ambekar SS (2012) GGE biplot analysis to evaluate genotype, environment and their interactions in sorghum multilocation data. Euphytica 185:465–479
Roostaei M, Mohammadi R, Amri A (2014) Rank correlation among different statistical models in ranking of winter wheat genotypes. Crop J 2:154–163
Sangwan O, Avtar R, Amit S (2013) Stability analysis in some ashwagandha [Withania somnifera (L.) Dunal] genotypes. Indian J Plant Sci 2(1):66–71
Shahriari Z, Heidari B, Dadkhodaie A (2018) Dissection of genotype × environment interactions for mucilage and seed yield in Plantago species: Application of AMMI and GGE biplot analyses. PLoS ONE 13(5):e0196095
Sharma A, Vats SK, Pati PK (2014) Post-inflectional dynamics of leaf spot disease in Withania somnifera. Ann Appl Biol 165:429–440
Yan W, Tinker NA (2006) Biplot analysis of multi-environment trial data: Principles and applications. Can J Plant Sci 86(3):623–645
Yan W, Kang MS, Ma B, Woods S, Cornelius PL (2007) GGE Biplot vs. AMMI analysis of genotype-by-environment data. Crop Sci 47:643–655